AHP
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #16
So do you think just the 2nd gear launch is what contributed to higher trap speeds in the last three runs?
No, seems to be related to heat soak. When I arrived I didn't let the car cool down at all. No one was running so I immediately went to tech and got in the lanes and hot-lapped. There were a few more degrees of ignition advance on the last 3 due to better AIT hence the MPH diff. Passes 2 and 3 were hot-lapped but AITs were back down by them time I got back to the staging lanes.
Thanks! I had no idea you could just toss in more etoh and the car would compensate. When you say lean, it’s because the factory fuel setup can’t keep up past around E40?
What’s the unit on the X axis of your graph, time? What’s the scale if it’s time?
Software limitation vs hardware (at this point). The DME trims are limited to +/- 25 (not sure if that is 25% or arbitrary) and once you max out the trims you'll get a lean code. With a proper tune you can extend that until you hit a physical limitation, hence being able to do E50.
No. While there are throttle closures at shift points, there are several more. They can be smoothed out a little bit, but these actually don't look all that bad. It never fully closes. JB4 will adapt a little bit over time.
@AHP how about that log file
I'll post a link once I have a chance to log back in and set to public. I also have some thoughts and assumptions on the throttle closure that I will cover when I have moment later today. I think it can be somewhat improved with a custom map and different launch strategy.
Sponsored