Crazy boost readings with e30 bm3 stage 2 ots

Z4m40i

Active Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
26
Reaction score
55
Location
Salt Lake City
Car(s)
2020 BMW z4 m40i, 2020 BMW X7 40i
Hi everyone,

new to the forum, but active on Bimmerpost. Unfortunately the mod scene for the z4 is black badging and window tinting with that crowd.

anywho here are the facts:
-2020 bmw z4 m40i
-BM3 OTS stage 2, e30 + 91ACN fuel
- AA dp, exhaust, intake.

installed BM3 flex fuel kit earlier today and just did itā€™s first fill with corn. Did some WOT pulls, but manually shifted before redline just to work up to the power/make sure I donā€™t grenade anything.

car feels and sounds great. Pulls strong with nothing out of the ordinary.. except the amount of boost. From the handful of logs Iā€™ve seen, it looks like most people with similar setups are doing low to mid 20s for boost with ethanol. Before ethanol, my car was logging those boost numbers. But now itā€™s saying itā€™s in the 30s. Both MAP and prethrottle boost have similar numbers.

Iā€™d imagine the turbo is well out of its efficiency range, but IATs are still looking good. Any thoughts on this?

IMG_1506.png
Sponsored

 

black_sedan

Well-Known Member
First Name
BR
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
641
Reaction score
548
Location
Northeast Florida
Car(s)
a90 Supra, Ford Raptor
doubt your pressure is in the 30 psi range. Subtract 14.7 and thatā€™s your boost minus atmospheric pressure. If you subtract the target boost with 14.7, thats right around 22psi.
 

Thraxbert

Well-Known Member
First Name
Robert
Joined
May 3, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
1,893
Location
Texas
Car(s)
'20 Supra 3L, boosted 3.8L Gen Coupe, '93 Jimny
+1 PSIA vs PSIG.
 
OP
OP
Z4m40i

Z4m40i

Active Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
26
Reaction score
55
Location
Salt Lake City
Car(s)
2020 BMW z4 m40i, 2020 BMW X7 40i
Thanks for the reply!

that sounds very reasonable; although I did double check my settings, and my readout settings for pressure is set as ā€œrelativeā€ vs absolute. Iā€™m under the impression that ā€œabsoluteā€ would not correct for atmospheric pressure- but this is out of my wheelhouse.
 

razorlab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan / Briana
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
4,768
Reaction score
9,610
Location
Your moms bedsheets
Car(s)
Not a Corvette.
Thanks for the reply!

that sounds very reasonable; although I did double check my settings, and my readout settings for pressure is set as ā€œrelativeā€ vs absolute. Iā€™m under the impression that ā€œabsoluteā€ would not correct for atmospheric pressure- but this is out of my wheelhouse.
Contact bm3. I had the same issue even when set correctly. They had to do some updates to their software.
 
OP
OP
Z4m40i

Z4m40i

Active Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
26
Reaction score
55
Location
Salt Lake City
Car(s)
2020 BMW z4 m40i, 2020 BMW X7 40i
Contact bm3. I had the same issue even when set correctly. They had to do some updates to their software.
thank you for sharing your experience. @black_sedan reply actually lead me to an old post you made. This seems to be the right direction!
Obviously off putting when the screen shot of my data log shows ā€œpsigā€
IMG_1507.png
 

i3igpete

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
359
Reaction score
306
Location
Chicago
Car(s)
2023 3.0L 8AT
Obviously off putting when the screen shot of my data log shows ā€œpsigā€
i suspected that it was a unit labelling bug too, but wanted someone with hands on experience to confirm. sometimes no info is better than bad info.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 




Top